Thursday, 8 July 2010

How about wrong?

An independent report released Wednesday into the leaked "Climategate" e-mails found no evidence to question the "rigor and honesty" of scientists involved.
Yes, but that doesn't mean the CRU team are right does it? As far as all their doomsaying predictions are concerned predicting man made climate Armageddon they and the IPCC are on a bigger losing streak than a bad gambler.

How often do they have to be wrong before they'll review the whole silly CO2 premise? Just because they can't think what else it could be, doesn't mean it's what they say it is. If we all had ossified thought processes like that, the Western world would never have got out of the stone age.

Stuff it. I've got work to do.

No comments:

Related Posts with Thumbnails